Re: [PATCH 0/6] Towards a generalized sequencer

Hi Jonathan,

Jonathan Nieder writes:

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

quoted

Note: I didn't know what to do with the license header in the fifth
patch.  I just assumed that it was some historical cruft and removed
it.

Please don't.  Technically it's allowed by the license if I understand
correctly (since the copyright notices are not accompanied by a
disclaimer of warranty) but it's almost always the wrong thing to do
to remove a copyright notice without the author's permission.

Um, ok.  I still don't know what to do:
1. Should I leave it in builtin/revert.c?  There are only a few tiny
functions left there.
2. Should I move it to sequencer.c and and modify it accordingly?
It'll read Copyright (C) 2011 <Me>, based on builtin/revert.c which is
Copyright Dscho, which in turn is based on git-revert.sh Copyright
Linus and Junio?  Isn't this information redundant? Can't `log` and
`blame -M -C` do a much better job?

Thanks.

-- Ram