Re: [PATCH] For Real - Fixed pluralization in diff reports

Heya,

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 20:27, Jon Forrest [off-list ref] wrote:

I entirely agree. My point is only that the various tests
that expect the current behavior will have to be changed
whether the implementation of correct plurals uses my
inferior method or the way more correct i18n method.

Wouldn't it be a nice hack if we just solved problem through i18n
then? Have all the plumbing see the current wording, but through i18n
change it to something grammatically correct for the porcelain.
Probably not possible, but a nice daydream :).

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier