Re: [PATCH 10/25] gettextize: git-merge basic messages

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:

Yeah, I was just hoping I could get away with it :)

To be clear, I think you made a reasonable choice at this stage of
development.

Aside: maybe for translation (though not for gettextizing) the idea of
patches that get applied to the development tree is more trouble than
it's worth.  GNU sed and some similar projects do not include
translations in the development tree but fetch them from
translationproject.org as part of the "bootstrap" procedure when
building a source tarball or binaries.

See autoboot in git://git.sv.gnu.org/sed.git for example.