Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -814,15 +814,15 @@ static void wt_shortstatus_print_tracking(struct wt_status *s)
[...]
} else {
- color_fprintf(s->fp, header_color, "ahead ");
+ color_fprintf(s->fp, header_color, _("ahead "));
color_fprintf(s->fp, branch_color_local, "%d", num_ours);
- color_fprintf(s->fp, header_color, ", behind ");
+ color_fprintf(s->fp, header_color, _(", behind "));
color_fprintf(s->fp, branch_color_remote, "%d", num_theirs);
What we make those translators suffer through. :) Would it be possible to
(eventually) introduce an interface vaguely like
color_fprintf2(s->fp, "%C(ahead )%C(%d)%C(, behind )%C( %d)",
header_color,
branch_color_local, num_ours,
header_color,
branch_color_remote, num_theirs);
? I guess this would require using strbuf_expand instead of vsnprintf
for %d et al.