Re: [PATCH 06/25] gettextize: git-fetch formatting messages
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:49:28
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 20:28, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 02:59:37PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:quoted
(+cc: some fetch ui authors, just as a heads up)Thanks. I think Nico actually did the fetch code, though, and I more or less copied it for push.quoted
quoted
@@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ static int update_local_ref(struct ref *ref,* If this is the head, and it's not okay to update * the head, and the old value of the head isn't empty... */ - sprintf(display, "! %-*s %-*s -> %s (can't fetch in current branch)", - TRANSPORT_SUMMARY_WIDTH, "[rejected]", REFCOL_WIDTH, remote, + sprintf(display, _("! %-*s %-*s -> %s (can't fetch in current branch)"), + TRANSPORT_SUMMARY_WIDTH, _("[rejected]"), REFCOL_WIDTH, remote,Regardless of the answer, we should probably be either consistently translating or not translating it within this patch. e.g. for not translating (though I suspect translating is the better choice): sprintf(display, "! %-*s %-*s -> %s %s", TRANSPORT_SUMMARY_WIDTH, "[rejected]", REFCOL_WIDTH, remote, pretty_ref, _("(can't fetch in current branch)"));I think you can translate "[rejected]" here, too.
Thanks. I missed that one.
However, do be aware of the --porcelain output for git-push. It was tacked on much later, and I fear it may use some of the same strings. Some of them are perhaps OK to translate (the human readable bit at the end, e.g.), but others maybe not. I haven't looked closely.
There's probably more potential issues like that because I didn't know the code well, but hopefully not too many.