Re: [PATCH] t/README: clarify test_must_fail description

On 07/20/2010 01:00 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:

How about being more explicit?

    Run a git command and ensure it fails in a controlled way.  Use
    this instead of "! <git-command>".  When git-command dies due to a
    segfault, test_must_fail diagnoses it as an error; "! <git-command>"
    treats it as just another expected failure. letting such a bug go
    unnoticed.

Much better.  If you want the last sentence to be grammatically correct,
you could rephrase it like this:

   ...just another expected failure, which would let such a bug go unnoticed.

-brandon