Thread (37 messages) flat view 37 messages, 6 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [patch 02/15] const-expr.patch

From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:26

Gary V. Vaughan schrieb:
Unfortunately, there are still plenty of production systems with
vendor compilers that choke unless all compound declarations can be
determined statically at compile time, for example hpux10.20 (I can
provide a comprehensive list of our supported platforms that exhibit
this problem if necessary).
Yes, a comprehensive list would be appreciated. This change is an
uglification that I personally would prefer to stay out of the code base
unless many consumers of git are hurt.

The problem with this non-feature is that it is all too easy that new code
introduces new incompatibilities.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Index: b/ll-merge.c
===================================================================
--- a/ll-merge.c
+++ b/ll-merge.c
BTW, did you notice that git is a version control system that hosts itself? ;)
+	dict[0].placeholder = "O"; dict[0].value = temp[0];
+	dict[1].placeholder = "A"; dict[1].value = temp[1];
+	dict[2].placeholder = "B"; dict[2].value = temp[2];
+	dict[3].placeholder = "L"; dict[3].value = temp[3];
+	dict[3].placeholder = NULL; dict[3].value = NULL;
	dict[4]...

-- Hannes
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help