Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] Honour the refspec when updating refs after import

On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:

Heya,

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 01:19, Daniel Barkalow [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I didn't understand the version of my patch that contains your changes,
and I didn't know what was in it.

Either way, I managed to apply your patch, will send a new version of
the series tomorrow.

Does it make sense now in what it's trying to do? (And does it turn out to 
work?) I'm fairly certain it's the easiest way to make the remote appear 
most natural to the rest of git, but I don't actually have code that wants 
to use it, so I wouldn't know if this just wouldn't work for hg or 
something.

quoted

I don't know why Junio squashed your
changes into my patch, particularly when I disagreed with those changes.

Junio didn't squash anything, it's just that pu still contains v4 of
the series, in which I had squashed my changes in.

Oh, okay. You probably shouldn't squash un-acked changes into other 
people's patches when taking over their series.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*