Re: [PATCH v3] parse-opt: migrate builtin-ls-files.

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:16:38PM -0800, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

Miklos Vajna [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Was this dropped on the floor by accident?

I am not fundamentally opposed to the parseopt conversion, but I was
somewhat discouraged from taking another one, after we got burned by the
one that converted git-apply without much visible gain but with a new bug.

Because ls-files is a plumbing, it has somewhat lower priority for user
friendliness than any other patches currently in-flight on the list; hence
it has been backburnered.  It still is kept in my Inbox.

I'm just asking again as I see the parseopt patch for builtin-config now
on the list.

Should I just resend this patch after v1.6.2?