On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:16:38PM -0800, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
I am not fundamentally opposed to the parseopt conversion, but I was
somewhat discouraged from taking another one, after we got burned by the
one that converted git-apply without much visible gain but with a new bug.
Because ls-files is a plumbing, it has somewhat lower priority for user
friendliness than any other patches currently in-flight on the list; hence
it has been backburnered. It still is kept in my Inbox.
Makes sense, thanks for the answer.