Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins
From: Matthew Wilcox <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:14
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins · Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins · Perry Wagle <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins · Matthew Wilcox <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins · Teemu Likonen <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins · Perry Wagle <hidden>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:00:17AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
In HP-UX many commands (or "subsystems") use /opt/<subsys>/{bin,sbin} to place
their binaries. PATH usually does not contain all of them. That's against Linux
philosophy I think, and I really don't like huge PATHs, but it may be one solution
to reduce the size of linear lists. It won't help against the git<TAB><TAB> issue
directly, however.In HP-UX, the default shell has a line length limit that is smaller than the length of $PATH. Be in awe of enterprise scalability. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."