Thread (76 messages) flat view 76 messages, 33 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins

From: Teemu Likonen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:13

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Jeff King wrote (2008-08-26 13:07 -0400):
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:25:13PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
quoted
quoted
git-<tab><tab> ... what? 140-something commands? I'll better start
looking for alternatives _right now_!
Actually, this is the only realistic argument I can remember at all.
Are there any others? I couldn't come up with any - but I didn't do
much history digging: others seem to be equally in dark, though.
The three reasons I can recall are:
Don't know about "original" reasons but filling users' ~/bin isn't nice 
either. I always install all of the self-built git under $HOME. Since 
"make install" (by default) used to fill ~/bin with those 140 git-* 
executables I already configured git to install itself to a custom 
directory. I had to use $GIT_EXEC_PATH and create some symlinks but with 
1.6.0 I don't have to do this anymore. Me happy.

Setting $GIT_EXEC_PATH wasn't a big deal and I can't see it being a big 
deal now, for some other people, to extend their $PATH to include every  
imaginable git-* executable in the system.

BTW I'd also vote for reducing the number of commands printed with "git 
<tab><tab>" bash-completion.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help