Re: [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell"
From: Tommi Virtanen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:13
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell" · Dmitry V. Levin <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell" · Tommi Virtanen <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell" · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell" · Tommi Virtanen <hidden>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:20:38PM +0400, Dmitry Potapov wrote:
Perhaps, /usr/sbin would be a better place, as it is intended only for system administration binaries.
I'd argue that git-shell isn't *exclusively* for root, which is the
criteria for sbin. It's pretty easy to imagine a user setting up their
own ~/.ssh/authorized_keys with a special passphraseless key that
can only do git operations.
--
:(){ :|:&};: