Re: [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell"
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:13
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell" · Dmitry V. Levin <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell" · Tommi Virtanen <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell" · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] "git shell" won't work, need "git-shell" · Tommi Virtanen <hidden>
Tommi Virtanen [off-list ref] writes:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 01:36:37PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
Of course it would. Does using /usr/libexec/git-core/git-shell work?It would, but do you really want people using that?
I do not have particular preference either way. What people wanted was to have smaller number of git-foo on $PATH, and especially as "git-shell" is not something people would be typing from their command line, so I dunno.