Re: [PATCH] Change 'Deltifying objects' to 'Delta compressing objects'
From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:43
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:01:02PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:quoted
Maybe the "Removing unused objects" should use the common progress infrastructure? It could even use the delayed interface, just like when checking out files, so no progress at all is displayed when that operation completes within a certain delay. And the removal of unused objects is usually quick.Are you volunteering (I think you know the progress code best)? Otherwise, I will get to it, but probably not tonight.
If I do it that won't be today either.
quoted
But I like the statistics. They might be pretty handy to diagnoze performance issues on remote servers for example.They are by far the most useful of the three lines I mentioned, but I just wonder if they are a bit meaningless and cluttery for light users. We can always cut the others and see how it looks.
Frankly, I think effort should be spent on the refs update display at this point. Something that looks like: * refs/heads/origin: fast forward to branch 'master' of git://gi t.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6 old..new: 66ffb04..4fa4d23 [ note that I arbitrarily cut the long line before the 80th column to show the effect within an email ] You usually get long lines that gets wrapped, so that means 3 lines of screen space for one updated branches. Is the "66ffb04..4fa4d23" information really useful? Might someone ever care? Nicolas