Thread (36 messages) flat view 36 messages, 7 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 6/7] Eradicate yet-another-buffer implementation in buitin-rerere.c

From: Pierre Habouzit <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:34

On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 08:03:28AM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
  crap, and I did that in the 5th patch as well. well, I'll maybe send
privately a "fixed" version of the patch to junio then, to avoid
flooding the list with spacing issues.
Heh, no need.  I can fix them up locally here.
  okay, perfect.
For me personally, your use of Mail-Followup-To: header is very
much more irritating.  When I want to talk to you, I want my MUA
to put YOUR name on To: header, not Johannes.  I consider it
rude and selfish to use M-F-T to avoid getting duplicates from a
mailing list you subscribe to.

I have said this often enough in the past, and have been trying
not to say this unless necessary.  It is sad and happy at the
same time that I still occasionary need to bring this up.

Sad because I have to get irritated enough before I say this,
  I'm sorry, I'll remove it (for the next mail though, I'm too lazy to
change that right now). It's a policy on Debian lists to force M-F-T,
and it's indeed not very practical on lists like the lkml or git. I
could have guessed that myself.
and happy because it means I found another person who is worth
communicating with and expect to communicate again with on the
list.
  heh, thanks :)
Please, don't.
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help