Re: strbuf new API, take 2 for inclusion

On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:16:21PM +0000, Jeff King wrote:

On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:15:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:

quoted

  Yes, Junio already did that remark. The reason is that it's forward
compatible: if we ever change strbuf's intitial value for some reason,
we would just have to rebuild the code. As junio disliked it (and I'm
not sure I love it either) I've used it where using the _init() function
was impractical.

OK, I missed that discussion. Thanks for the explanation.

  That was on IRC, maybe that's the why :)

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org