Re: strbuf new API, take 2 for inclusion
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:33
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 01:20:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I've also stripped as many STRBUF_INIT uses as possible, some people didn't liked it. I've kept its use for "static" strbufs where it's way more convenient that a function call.
The STRBUF_INIT initializer just sets everything to '0' or NULL. Static objects already have this done automagically by the compiler, so there's no need to use STRBUF_INIT at all there. -Peff