Re: [RFC PATCH] Rename "bury" back to "sink".

Yann Dirson [off-list ref] writes:

Side note about the "stg move" name: yes it could possible to mistake it
for "move file" (especially as we don't have "stg mv").  My current
state of mind would be to drop add/rm/cp from stgit, and move the "stg
cp" logic to a new git-cp command.  This way, stgit would just be
about handling series of patches, with git being used for the
working-copy.  Any opinions on this ?

For this reason, and others, I think "stg reorder" would be better.
Especially if you implement Karl's suggestion of reordering all
patches in an editor.

-- 
David Kågedal