Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [RFC PATCH] Rename "bury" back to "sink".

From: Chris Shoemaker <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:08

On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:13:53PM +0200, Karl Hasselström wrote:
On 2007-05-05 00:53:03 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
quoted
Well, it looks like the voices we heard on this naming issue were
quite equally cast towards each of the 2 name.

Let my vote be to get back to "sink", so the user can easily pair
the command with "float". I expect that any previously-silent
majoity prefering "bury" will talk now, before Catalin decides if he
wants this patch in the next release :)
Well, my vote is still for "sink"! If it is to be called "stg bury",
I'd have to vote for changing "stg float" to "stg unearth". :-)
Just my 2.5 cents:

float/sink are clearly related, while I wouldn't associate float/bury
at all.  Also, "bury" is sometimes euphemistic for "kill", so
bury/resurrect is a clear pair.  Anyway, "sink" makes perfect sense to
me.

-chris
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help