Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
From: Rene Herman <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-16 15:57:36
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2007-08-17 · Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl · Rene Herman <hidden>
- 2007-08-17 · Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
- 2007-08-17 · Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
- 2007-08-16 · Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2007-08-15 · Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl · Al Viro <hidden>
On 08/16/2007 05:40 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 12:58:19PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
quoted
The git-blame thing as sketched before by Linus would never be able to point out mailing lists, or general lists of "interested parties" for example, but these properties can do anything...No, they can not. "I'm interested in drivers/foo/bar.c fixes" is not an earth-shattering event and it sure as hell does not create a new revision of the tree.
That's true. Okay, it can't do those general lists of interested parties. Rene.