Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: 2007-08-15 09:29:20
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2007-08-17 · Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl · Rene Herman <hidden>
- 2007-08-17 · Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
- 2007-08-17 · Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
- 2007-08-16 · Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2007-08-15 · Re: [PATCH] [1/2many] - FInd the maintainer(s) for a patch - scripts/get_maintainer.pl · Al Viro <hidden>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
#!/bin/sh git log --since=6.months.ago -- "$@" | grep -i '^ [-a-z]*by:.*@' | sort | uniq -c | sort -r -n | head and it gives you a rather good picture of who is involved with a particular subdirectory or file.
No, it doesn't. The subscribers of [off-list ref] are not listed in patch logs. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== =--- -==== http://arcgraph.de/sr/