Thread (132 messages) 132 messages, 13 authors, 2021-04-29

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/7] eal: add wrappers for POSIX string functions

From: Nick Connolly <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-02 11:27:53

quoted
DPDK supports a variety of platforms and toolsets and my experience with
SPDK suggests that we'll end up with compiler specific ifdef's.
I'd argue they are inevitable. Consider POSIX close(): if it's missing, what
would be a correct fallback? It depends on the execution environment (OS).
String function fallbacks, of course, are easily implemented from scratch.
Agreed.
quoted
Public functions without rte_ prefix shall not be introduced at all.
Agreed. Perhaps as a separate patch we should consider validation rules 
to enforce the requirements.

Regards,
Nick
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help