On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 9:57 AM Thomas Monjalon [off-list ref] wrote:

18/01/2021 18:42, Ajit Khaparde:

quoted

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:17 AM Xueming Li [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

+enum rte_eth_representor_type {
+       RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_NONE, /**< not a representor. */
+       RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_VF,   /**< representor of VF. */
+       RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_SF,   /**< representor of SF. */

Till we get used to the terminology...
Can we also have SF = "Sub Function" mentioned in the docs or comments?

Are we sure about the definition?
I remember seeing SF = Scalable Function somewhere else (maybe from Intel)

That complicates it. But if they mean the same thing, let's pick one.