Thread (209 messages) 209 messages, 11 authors, 2021-04-12

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/9] ethdev: introduce representor type

From: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Date: 2021-01-18 17:42:54

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:17 AM Xueming Li [off-list ref] wrote:
To support more representor type, this patch introduces representor type
enum. The enum is subject to extend for new types upcoming.

Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <redacted>
Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <redacted>
Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c        |  7 +++++++
 drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c        |  7 +++++++
 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c        |  8 ++++++++
 drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c      |  8 ++++++++
 drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c      | 11 +++++++++++
 lib/librte_ethdev/ethdev_private.c    |  5 +++++
 lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_driver.h |  9 +++++++++
 7 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
index 74b0f3d1dc..d7c8b3ec07 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
@@ -5586,6 +5586,13 @@ static int bnxt_rep_port_probe(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev,
        int i, ret = 0;
        struct rte_kvargs *kvlist = NULL;

+       if (eth_da->type == RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_NONE)
+               return 0;
+       if (eth_da->type != RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_VF) {
+               PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "unsupported representor type %d\n",
+                           eth_da->type);
+               return -ENOTSUP;
+       }
        num_rep = eth_da->nb_representor_ports;
        if (num_rep > BNXT_MAX_VF_REPS) {
                PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "nb_representor_ports = %d > %d MAX VF REPS\n",
Ack. Thanks

:::: snip ::::
+/** Ethernet device representor type */
+enum rte_eth_representor_type {
+       RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_NONE, /**< not a representor. */
+       RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_VF,   /**< representor of VF. */
+       RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_SF,   /**< representor of SF. */
Till we get used to the terminology...
Can we also have SF = "Sub Function" mentioned in the docs or comments?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+       RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_PF,   /**< representor of host PF. */
+};
+
 /** Generic Ethernet device arguments  */
 struct rte_eth_devargs {
        uint16_t ports[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
@@ -1203,6 +1211,7 @@ struct rte_eth_devargs {
        /** representor port/s identifier to enable on device */
        uint16_t nb_representor_ports;
        /** number of ports in representor port field */
+       enum rte_eth_representor_type type; /* type of representor */
 };

 /**
--
2.25.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help