Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 7 authors, 2020-07-08

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter

From: Carrillo, Erik G <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-18 15:17:51

Hi Phil,

Good catch - thanks for the fix.   I've commented in-line:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Yang <redacted>
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 6:20 AM
To: dev@dpdk.org; Carrillo, Erik G <redacted>
Cc: drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com; honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com;
ruifeng.wang@arm.com; dharmik.thakkar@arm.com; nd@arm.com;
stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter

The n_poll_lcores counter and poll_lcore array are shared between lcores
and the update of these variables are out of the protection of spinlock on
each lcore timer list. The read-modify-write operations of the counter are
not atomic, so it has the potential of race condition between lcores.

Use c11 atomics with RELAXED ordering to prevent confliction.

Fixes: cc7b73ea9e3b ("eventdev: add new software timer adapter")
Cc: erik.g.carrillo@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <redacted>
---
 lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
index 005459f..6a0e283 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
@@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ swtim_callback(struct rte_timer *tim)
 	uint16_t nb_evs_invalid = 0;
 	uint64_t opaque;
 	int ret;
+	int n_lcores;

 	opaque = evtim->impl_opaque[1];
 	adapter = (struct rte_event_timer_adapter *)(uintptr_t)opaque;
@@ -605,8 +606,12 @@ swtim_callback(struct rte_timer *tim)
 				      "with immediate expiry value");
 		}

-		if (unlikely(rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&sw-
quoted
in_use[lcore].v)))
-			sw->poll_lcores[sw->n_poll_lcores++] = lcore;
+		if (unlikely(rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&sw-
quoted
in_use[lcore].v))) {
+			n_lcores = __atomic_fetch_add(&sw->n_poll_lcores,
1,
+						__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
Just a nit, but let's align the continued line with the opening parentheses in
this location and below.  With these changes:

Acked-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+			__atomic_store_n(&sw->poll_lcores[n_lcores],
lcore,
+						__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+		}
 	} else {
 		EVTIM_BUF_LOG_DBG("buffered an event timer expiry
event");
@@ -1011,6 +1016,7 @@ __swtim_arm_burst(const struct
rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
 	uint32_t lcore_id = rte_lcore_id();
 	struct rte_timer *tim, *tims[nb_evtims];
 	uint64_t cycles;
+	int n_lcores;

 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_EVENTDEV_DEBUG
 	/* Check that the service is running. */ @@ -1033,8 +1039,10 @@
__swtim_arm_burst(const struct rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
 	if (unlikely(rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&sw->in_use[lcore_id].v))) {
 		EVTIM_LOG_DBG("Adding lcore id = %u to list of lcores to
poll",
 			      lcore_id);
-		sw->poll_lcores[sw->n_poll_lcores] = lcore_id;
-		++sw->n_poll_lcores;
+		n_lcores = __atomic_fetch_add(&sw->n_poll_lcores, 1,
+						__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+		__atomic_store_n(&sw->poll_lcores[n_lcores], lcore_id,
+						__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
 	}

 	ret = rte_mempool_get_bulk(sw->tim_pool, (void **)tims,
--
2.7.4
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help