Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter
From: Carrillo, Erik G <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-18 15:17:51
Hi Phil, Good catch - thanks for the fix. I've commented in-line:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message----- From: Phil Yang <redacted> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 6:20 AM To: dev@dpdk.org; Carrillo, Erik G <redacted> Cc: drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com; honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com; ruifeng.wang@arm.com; dharmik.thakkar@arm.com; nd@arm.com; stable@dpdk.org Subject: [PATCH 1/3] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter The n_poll_lcores counter and poll_lcore array are shared between lcores and the update of these variables are out of the protection of spinlock on each lcore timer list. The read-modify-write operations of the counter are not atomic, so it has the potential of race condition between lcores. Use c11 atomics with RELAXED ordering to prevent confliction. Fixes: cc7b73ea9e3b ("eventdev: add new software timer adapter") Cc: erik.g.carrillo@intel.com Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <redacted> Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <redacted> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <redacted> --- lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.cb/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c index 005459f..6a0e283 100644--- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c@@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ swtim_callback(struct rte_timer *tim) uint16_t nb_evs_invalid = 0; uint64_t opaque; int ret; + int n_lcores; opaque = evtim->impl_opaque[1]; adapter = (struct rte_event_timer_adapter *)(uintptr_t)opaque;@@ -605,8 +606,12 @@ swtim_callback(struct rte_timer *tim) "with immediate expiry value"); } - if (unlikely(rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&sw-quoted
in_use[lcore].v)))- sw->poll_lcores[sw->n_poll_lcores++] = lcore; + if (unlikely(rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&sw-quoted
in_use[lcore].v))) {+ n_lcores = __atomic_fetch_add(&sw->n_poll_lcores, 1, + __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
Just a nit, but let's align the continued line with the opening parentheses in this location and below. With these changes: Acked-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ __atomic_store_n(&sw->poll_lcores[n_lcores], lcore, + __ATOMIC_RELAXED); + } } else { EVTIM_BUF_LOG_DBG("buffered an event timer expiry event");@@ -1011,6 +1016,7 @@ __swtim_arm_burst(const structrte_event_timer_adapter *adapter, uint32_t lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); struct rte_timer *tim, *tims[nb_evtims]; uint64_t cycles; + int n_lcores; #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_EVENTDEV_DEBUG /* Check that the service is running. */ @@ -1033,8 +1039,10 @@ __swtim_arm_burst(const struct rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter, if (unlikely(rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&sw->in_use[lcore_id].v))) { EVTIM_LOG_DBG("Adding lcore id = %u to list of lcores to poll", lcore_id); - sw->poll_lcores[sw->n_poll_lcores] = lcore_id; - ++sw->n_poll_lcores; + n_lcores = __atomic_fetch_add(&sw->n_poll_lcores, 1, + __ATOMIC_RELAXED); + __atomic_store_n(&sw->poll_lcores[n_lcores], lcore_id, + __ATOMIC_RELAXED); } ret = rte_mempool_get_bulk(sw->tim_pool, (void **)tims, -- 2.7.4