Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] virtio-user: add new virtual pci driver for virtio
From: Yuanhan Liu <hidden>
Date: 2016-05-16 02:51:49
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 01:48:01AM +0000, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
quoted
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:54:33AM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:quoted
So, I'd suggest something like following: if (is_vdev(..)) { The blocker issue of your suggestion is that we have no such condition. Previously, I use dev_type, but as David's comment said:That's not the only option. There should be others, for example, checking the existence of virtio_user_device. Or even, you could add a new flag inside virtio hw while initiating your vdev.quoted
May I ask how many more such handling are needed, excluding the txqueuequoted
header desc setup? And as stated, in generic, yes, we should try that. Those which need special handling: (1) vq->vq_ring_mem: it is set but never used, so it's out of question. (2) vq->virtio_net_hdr_mem and vring_hdr_desc_initvring_hdr_desc_init is common.quoted
(3) vq->offset Just (2) and (3) so far. And the question is quite clear: where to put these two special handling.Apparently, you can't put it into the queue_setup(). And I still think my proposal works great here.OK, since it's indeed inappropriate to put these special handlings inside queue_setup() from semantic perspective, I'll add them according to if hw->vdev_private == NULL in the driver.
I'm thinking maybe we could rename "vdev_private" to "virtio_user_dev" (or something like that), to make it explicit that it's for virtio user device. I mean, there should be no other vdevs after all. OTOH, using "hw->vdev_private != NULL" to say it's a virtio-user device is a bit weird; it doesn't even make too much sense. --yliu