On 09/24/2012 07:38 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:

On 09/24/2012 05:56 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:

quoted

quoted

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:

quoted

The reason I say it is orthogonal, is that people will still want to see
their caches in /proc/slabinfo, regardless of wherever else they'll be.
It was a requirement from Pekka in one of the first times I posted this,
IIRC.

They want to see total counts there true. But as I said we already have a
duplication of the statistics otherwise. We have never done the scheme
that you propose. That is unexpected. I would not expect the numbers to be
there.

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Glauber Costa [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I myself personally believe it can potentially clutter slabinfo, and
won't put my energy in defending the current implementation. What I
don't want is to keep switching between implementations.

Pekka, Tejun, what do you guys say here?

So Christoph is proposing that the new caches appear somewhere under
the cgroups directory and /proc/slabinfo includes aggregated counts,
right? I'm certainly OK with that.

Just for clarification, I am not sure about the aggregate counts -
although it surely makes sense.

Christoph, is that what you're proposing ?


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>