Thread (83 messages) flat view 83 messages, 6 authors, 2021-07-06

[Buildroot] [PATCH 13/15] Makefile: Rsync global {TARGET, HOST}_DIR using exclusion file list

From: Yann E. MORIN <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-25 12:50:18

Herv?, All,

On 2021-06-25 13:59 +0200, Herve Codina spake thusly:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:34:10 +0200
"Yann E. MORIN" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 2021-06-24 22:20 +0200, Yann E. MORIN spake thusly:
quoted
On 2021-06-21 16:11 +0200, Herve Codina spake thusly:  
quoted
On a per-package build, rsync final {TARGET,HOST}_DIR using
exclusion file list computed for each packages.
As we rsync only files generated by each packages, we need to
to do this rsync recursively on each dependencies to collect
all needed files. This is done based on existing
<PKG>_FINAL_RECURSIVE_DEPENDENCIES  
I am not sure I understand why this is needed...

One thing that comes to mind is speedup. Indeed, now that we can ensure
that packages only install new files and don;t change existing files, we
can speedup the final aggregation by just handling the new files.

But since we are using hardlinks, the aggregation is rather fast...

Can you expand on the rationale in the commit log when you respin,
please?  
Now I have seen the next patch, it makes sense. Yet, it should be
explained here nonetheless. ;-)
The next patch just breaks the hardlinks had nothing to do with
the use of <PKG>_FINAL_RECURSIVE_DEPENDENCIES here.
Oh, I was not commenting about the _FINAL_RECURSIVE_DEPENDENCIES, but
about the need for an exclusion list to begin with. I totally agree
witht the rationale for using _FINAL_RECURSIVE_DEPENDENCIES.

[--SNIP--]
quoted
And to begin with, why are we generating an _exclude_ list, rather than
an _include_ list?
[--SNIP--]
quoted
(Totally untested, slippery code, excersise caution.)
Inclusion filter is not so simple ...

In rsync man, we can read:
[--SNIP--]

Indeed, I see now. The rsync filter is not about listing files; it is
deciding what should be or should not be transferred. Anything that is
not filtered-out is transferred.

So OK, using an exclude list toally makes sense.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help