Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: virtio: fix completion handling
From: Vincent Whitchurch <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-29 11:54:50
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
From: Vincent Whitchurch <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-29 11:54:50
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:47:09PM +0200, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 20-10-21, 12:38, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:quoted
I don't quite understand how that would be safe since virtqueue_add_sgs() can fail after a few iterations and all queued request buffers can have FAIL_NEXT set. In such a case, we would end up waiting forever with your proposed change, wouldn't we?Good point. I didn't think of that earlier. I think a good simple way of handling this is counting the number of buffers sent and received. Once they match, we are done. That shouldn't break anything else I believe.
That could work, but it's not so straightforward since you would have to introduce locking to prevent races since the final count is only known after virtio_i2c_prepare_reqs() completes, while the callback could be called before that. Please do not hesitate to send out a patch to fix it that way if that is what you prefer. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization