Thread (43 messages) 43 messages, 3 authors, 2021-10-20
STALE1687d REVIEWED: 4 (4M)
Revisions (3)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 current
  3. v3 [diff vs current]

[PATCH V2 01/12] virtio-blk: validate num_queues during probe

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-10-12 06:53:08
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: block layer, the rest, virtio block and scsi drivers, virtio core · Maintainers: Jens Axboe, Linus Torvalds, "Michael S. Tsirkin", Jason Wang

If an untrusted device neogitates BLK_F_MQ but advertises a zero
num_queues, the driver may end up trying to allocating zero size
buffers where ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned which may pass the checking
against the NULL. This will lead unexpected results.

Fixing this by using single queue if num_queues is zero.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 9b3bd083b411..9deff01a38cb 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -495,7 +495,8 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
 	err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
 				   struct virtio_blk_config, num_queues,
 				   &num_vqs);
-	if (err)
+	/* We need at least one virtqueue */
+	if (err || !num_vqs)
 		num_vqs = 1;
 
 	num_vqs = min_t(unsigned int, nr_cpu_ids, num_vqs);
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help