Re: [PATCH v3 42/75] x86/sev-es: Setup GHCB based boot #VC handler
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: 2020-06-04 15:30:36
Also in:
kvm, lkml
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: 2020-06-04 15:30:36
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:07:49PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
This are IDT entry points and the names above follow the convention for them, like e.g. 'page_fault', 'nmi' or 'general_protection'. Should I still add the verbs or just add a comment explaining what those symbols are?
Hmmkay, I see vc_no_ghcb doing
call do_vc_no_ghcb
and that's setup in early_idt_setup().
vc_boot_ghcb(), OTOH, is called by do_early_exception() only so that one
could be called handle_vc_boot_ghcb(), no? I.e., I don't see it being an
IDT entry point.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette