Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: move force_dma_unencrypted() to mem_encrypt.h
From: Christian Borntraeger <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-20 17:00:17
Also in:
linux-iommu, linux-s390, lkml
From: Christian Borntraeger <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-20 17:00:17
Also in:
linux-iommu, linux-s390, lkml
On 20.02.20 17:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 05:23:20PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:quoted
quoted
From a users perspective it makes absolutely perfect sense to use thebounce buffers when they are NEEDED. Forcing the user to specify iommu_platform just because you need bounce buffers really feels wrong. And obviously we have a severe performance issue because of the indirections.The point is that the user should not have to specify iommu_platform.
I (and Halil) agree on that. From a user perspective we want to have the right thing in the guest without any command option. The iommu_plaform thing was indeed a first step to make things work. I might mis-read Halils patch, but isnt one effect of this patch set that things WILL work without iommu_platform?
We need to make sure any new hypervisor (especially one that might require bounce buffering) always sets it, as was a rather bogus legacy hack that isn't extensibe for cases that for example require bounce buffering.