On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 20:40 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2017年08月21日 11:06, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
On 2017年08月19日 14:41, Koichiro Den wrote:
quoted
To depend on vq.num and the usage of VHOST_MAX_PEND is not succinct
and in some case unexpected, so revert its logic part only.
Hi:
Could you explain a little bit more on the case that is was not
sufficent?
Thanks
Just have another thought.
I wonder whether or not just use ulimit(memlock) is better here. It
looks more flexible.
Thanks
It sounds a better approach, though at present I have got no idea how much
portion it should be.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization