On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 20:40 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

On 2017年08月21日 11:06, Jason Wang wrote:

quoted

On 2017年08月19日 14:41, Koichiro Den wrote:

quoted

To depend on vq.num and the usage of VHOST_MAX_PEND is not succinct
and in some case unexpected, so revert its logic part only.

Hi:

Could you explain a little bit more on the case that is was not 
sufficent?

Thanks

Just have another thought.

I wonder whether or not just use ulimit(memlock) is better here. It 
looks more flexible.

Thanks

It sounds a better approach, though at present I have got no idea how much
portion it should be.

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization