Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 2 authors, 2013-08-30

Re: [PATCH 3/6] vhost: switch to use vhost_add_used_n()

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2013-08-20 02:36:23
Also in: kvm, lkml, netdev

On 08/16/2013 05:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
quoted
Let vhost_add_used() to use vhost_add_used_n() to reduce the code duplication.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Does compiler inline it then?
Reason I ask, last time I checked put_user inside vhost_add_used
was much cheaper than copy_to_user inside vhost_add_used_n,
so I wouldn't be surprised if this hurt performance.
Did you check?
I run virtio_test but didn't see the difference.

Did you mean the might_fault() in __copy_to_user()? So how about switch
to use __put_user() if count is one in __vhost_add_used_n()?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help