Re: [net-next RFC V5 0/5] Multiqueue virtio-net

From
Rick Jones <hidden>
Date
2012-07-09 16:46:57
Also in
kvm, lkml, netdev
Reply to
Jason Wang, 2012-07-09
On 07/08/2012 08:23 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 07/07/2012 12:23 AM, Rick Jones wrote:
quoted
On 07/06/2012 12:42 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
Which mechanism to address skew error?  The netperf manual describes
more than one:
This mechanism is missed in my test, I would add them to my test scripts.
quoted
http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/netperf.html#Using-Netperf-to-Measure-Aggregate-Performance


Personally, my preference these days is to use the "demo mode" method
of aggregate results as it can be rather faster than (ab)using the
confidence intervals mechanism, which I suspect may not really scale
all that well to large numbers of concurrent netperfs.
During my test, the confidence interval would even hard to achieved in
RR test when I pin vhost/vcpus in the processors, so I didn't use it.
When running aggregate netperfs, *something* has to be done to address the prospect of skew error.  Otherwise the results are suspect.

happy benchmarking,

rick jones
Thread (46 messages) 46 messages, 10 authors, last reply 2012-08-09
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help