Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-19 10:14:30
Also in:
kvm, lkml
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-19 10:14:30
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Asias He [off-list ref] wrote:
On 06/18/2012 06:58 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:quoted
As long as the latency is decreasing that's good. But It's worth keeping in mind that these percentages are probably wildly different on real storage devices and/or qemu-kvm. What we don't know here is whether this bottleneck matters in real environments - results with real storage and with qemu-kvm would be interesting.Yes. Here is the performance data on a Fusion-IO SSD device. Fio test is performed in a 8 vcpu guest with Fusion-IO based guest using kvm tool. Short version: With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write IOPS boost : 11%, 11%, 13%, 10% Latency improvement: 10%, 10%, 12%, 10%
Nice, I'm glad the improvement shows on real hardware. Stefan