Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 5 authors, 2011-11-14

RE: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: Move the mouse driver out of staging

From: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Date: 2011-11-14 02:40:33
Also in: lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:jkosina@suse.cz]
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:01 PM
To: Dmitry Torokhov
Cc: KY Srinivasan; gregkh@suse.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
devel@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization@lists.osdl.org; ohering@suse.com;
joe@perches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: Move the mouse driver out of staging

On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
quoted
I am not a hid expert; but all  hid low level drivers appear to do this.
Initially, I was directly invoking hid_connect() directly and based on your
Input, I chose to use hid_hw_start() which all other drivers are using.
Note that the users of hid_hw_start() actually are not low level
drivers, such as usbhid or bluetooth hidp, but higher-level drivers,
such as hid-wacom, hid-a4tech, etc. Since your driver is a low-level
driver (a provider so to speak) it should not call hid_hw_start() on its
own but rather wait for the hid code to do it.

Still, I am not a HID expert either so I'll defer to Jiri here.
Hi,

my understanding is that hv driver is actually a bit special in this
respect -- it's actually all-in-one both low-level and high-level driver.
I take it that there is not ever going to be a different high-level driver
using low-level hv transport (is that correct, KY?), so this might indeed
be an acceptable layout of the driver.
You are right Jiri. While this is a low level transport driver, there will never be a another
higher level driver using this transport.

Regards,

K. Y
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help