Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-19 17:57:57
Also in:
lkml, xen-devel
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-19 17:57:57
Also in:
lkml, xen-devel
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
Which architecture are you interested in? If it isn't x86, you can probably get anything past Linus ;) I'll do some measurements to see what effect the batchable ptep_set_wrprotect() has on native. If it's significant, I'll propose making it conditional on CONFIG_PARAVIRT.Oh, I mostly think about powerpc, I just wondered if I could re-use your new stuff in that context. Mostly idle thoughts at this stage, I haven't looked seriously.
There are general-purpose hooks in the common code which architectures can implement however they like. In x86-land we hook them up to pvops, but you can handle them however you want.
I have an old patch set to batch forks (and mprotect etc...) TLB invalidations (which is what I really want to batch on powerpc, more than the actual PTE changes) that involves subtle changes to the batching mechanisms etc...
Do you mean setting up batches of per-page tlb shootdowns rather than
going a global tlb flush at the end?
J