Thread (53 messages) 53 messages, 9 authors, 2006-08-23

Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h

From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-23 11:24:38
Also in: lkml

On Wednesday 23 August 2006 12:03, Zachary Amsden wrote:
Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted
quoted
And the functions they call?
    
Yes. But you only really need it for the actual callback, not the bulk
of stop_machine_run() (which calls scheduler and lots of other stuff)
The actual callback should be pretty limited already so it shouldn't
be a big limitation.

-Andi
  
Hmm.  Seems dangerous to rely on this, because functions could change 
from inline to out of line without people noticing that it affects this 
very corner case for kprobes + paravirt + stop_machine.  Is there a way 
to cascade the __kprobes declaration to all called functions, perhaps 
with a static checker, like sparse?
Not that I know of. But that wasn't what I suggested: my point was that
kprobes while stop machine is still doing setup or tear down is fine.
You only don't want them in your new per CPU callback. So it should be enough
to mark that callback __kprobes.

-Andi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help