Thread (53 messages) 53 messages, 9 authors, 2006-08-23

Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h

From: Adrian Bunk <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-22 14:08:33
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:56:03AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted
quoted
relicensing them.
   
That's a pretty strong statement...
 
Well, I'm not making any kind of legal statement.  I'm just pointing out 
that from a technical perspective, there's a large visible functional 
change from before if we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) vs 
EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_ops).  Given that the whole point of paravirt_ops 
is to minimize visible changes, this seems counterproductive.
It only affects kernels with the new functionality PARAVIRT=y, not 
kernels with the same functionality as today.

The alternative is to keep the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) and make 
the functions using it out of line functions.
   J
cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help