[PATCH 5.10 041/103] s390/qeth: fix locking for discipline setup / removal
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-01-15 12:46:43
Also in:
lkml
From: Julian Wiedmann <redacted>
[ Upstream commit b41b554c1ee75070a14c02a88496b1f231c7eacc ]
Due to insufficient locking, qeth_core_set_online() and
qeth_dev_layer2_store() can run in parallel, both attempting to load &
setup the discipline (and stepping on each other toes along the way).
A similar race can also occur between qeth_core_remove_device() and
qeth_dev_layer2_store().
Access to .discipline is meant to be protected by the discipline_mutex,
so add/expand the locking in qeth_core_remove_device() and
qeth_core_set_online().
Adjust the locking in qeth_l*_remove_device() accordingly, as it's now
handled by the callers in a consistent manner.
Based on an initial patch by Ursula Braun.
Fixes: 9dc48ccc68b9 ("qeth: serialize sysfs-triggered device configurations")
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 7 +++++--
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c | 5 +----
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 5 +----
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c@@ -6361,6 +6361,7 @@ static int qeth_core_probe_device(struct break; default: card->info.layer_enforced = true; + /* It's so early that we don't need the discipline_mutex yet. */ rc = qeth_core_load_discipline(card, enforced_disc); if (rc) goto err_load;
@@ -6393,10 +6394,12 @@ static void qeth_core_remove_device(stru QETH_CARD_TEXT(card, 2, "removedv"); + mutex_lock(&card->discipline_mutex); if (card->discipline) { card->discipline->remove(gdev); qeth_core_free_discipline(card); } + mutex_unlock(&card->discipline_mutex); qeth_free_qdio_queues(card);
@@ -6411,6 +6414,7 @@ static int qeth_core_set_online(struct c int rc = 0; enum qeth_discipline_id def_discipline; + mutex_lock(&card->discipline_mutex); if (!card->discipline) { def_discipline = IS_IQD(card) ? QETH_DISCIPLINE_LAYER3 : QETH_DISCIPLINE_LAYER2;
@@ -6424,11 +6428,10 @@ static int qeth_core_set_online(struct c } } - mutex_lock(&card->discipline_mutex); rc = qeth_set_online(card, card->discipline); - mutex_unlock(&card->discipline_mutex); err: + mutex_unlock(&card->discipline_mutex); return rc; } --- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c +++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c
@@ -2207,11 +2207,8 @@ static void qeth_l2_remove_device(struct qeth_set_allowed_threads(card, 0, 1); wait_event(card->wait_q, qeth_threads_running(card, 0xffffffff) == 0); - if (gdev->state == CCWGROUP_ONLINE) { - mutex_lock(&card->discipline_mutex); + if (gdev->state == CCWGROUP_ONLINE) qeth_set_offline(card, card->discipline, false); - mutex_unlock(&card->discipline_mutex); - } cancel_work_sync(&card->close_dev_work); if (card->dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED) --- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c +++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
@@ -1973,11 +1973,8 @@ static void qeth_l3_remove_device(struct qeth_set_allowed_threads(card, 0, 1); wait_event(card->wait_q, qeth_threads_running(card, 0xffffffff) == 0); - if (cgdev->state == CCWGROUP_ONLINE) { - mutex_lock(&card->discipline_mutex); + if (cgdev->state == CCWGROUP_ONLINE) qeth_set_offline(card, card->discipline, false); - mutex_unlock(&card->discipline_mutex); - } cancel_work_sync(&card->close_dev_work); if (card->dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED)