Thread (127 messages) 127 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-14
STALE3672d REVIEWED: 2 (0M)

[PATCH 3.16 049/114] libceph: kfree() in put_osd() shouldn't depend on authorizer

From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-13 18:48:40
Also in: lkml

3.16.36-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>

commit b28ec2f37e6a2bbd0bdf74b39cb89c74e4ad17f3 upstream.

a255651d4cad ("ceph: ensure auth ops are defined before use") made
kfree() in put_osd() conditional on the authorizer.  A mechanical
mistake most likely - fix it.

Cc: Alex Elder <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <redacted>
---
 net/ceph/osd_client.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
+++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
@@ -993,10 +993,11 @@ static void put_osd(struct ceph_osd *osd
 {
 	dout("put_osd %p %d -> %d\n", osd, atomic_read(&osd->o_ref),
 	     atomic_read(&osd->o_ref) - 1);
-	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&osd->o_ref) && osd->o_auth.authorizer) {
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&osd->o_ref)) {
 		struct ceph_auth_client *ac = osd->o_osdc->client->monc.auth;
 
-		ceph_auth_destroy_authorizer(ac, osd->o_auth.authorizer);
+		if (osd->o_auth.authorizer)
+			ceph_auth_destroy_authorizer(ac, osd->o_auth.authorizer);
 		kfree(osd);
 	}
 }
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help