3.2.63-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>

[ Upstream commit 18f38132528c3e603c66ea464727b29e9bbcb91b ]

The assumption was that update_mmu_cache() (and the equivalent for PMDs) would
only be called when the PTE being installed will be accessible by the user.

This is not true for code paths originating from remove_migration_pte().

There are dire consequences for placing a non-valid PTE into the TSB.  The TLB
miss frramework assumes thatwhen a TSB entry matches we can just load it into
the TLB and return from the TLB miss trap.

So if a non-valid PTE is in there, we will deadlock taking the TLB miss over
and over, never satisfying the miss.

Just exit early from update_mmu_cache() and friends in this situation.

Based upon a report and patch from Christopher Alexander Tobias Schulze.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <redacted>
---
 arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
index b4989f9..77ad815 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c

@@ -309,6 +309,10 @@ void update_mmu_cache(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, pte_t *
 	tsb_index = MM_TSB_BASE;
 	tsb_hash_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
 
+	/* Don't insert a non-valid PTE into the TSB, we'll deadlock.  */
+	if (!(pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_VALID))
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&mm->context.lock, flags);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE