[ 043/171] netfilter: nf_nat: dont check for port change on ICMP tuples
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2012-11-22 22:31:32
Also in:
lkml
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Ulrich Weber <redacted> commit 38fe36a248ec3228f8e6507955d7ceb0432d2000 upstream. ICMP tuples have id in src and type/code in dst. So comparing src.u.all with dst.u.all will always fail here and ip_xfrm_me_harder() is called for every ICMP packet, even if there was no NAT. Signed-off-by: Ulrich Weber <redacted> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> --- net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_standalone.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_standalone.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_standalone.c@@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ nf_nat_out(unsigned int hooknum, if ((ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u3.ip != ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3.ip) || - (ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u.all != + (ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.protonum != IPPROTO_ICMP && + ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.src.u.all != ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u.all) ) return ip_xfrm_me_harder(skb) == 0 ? ret : NF_DROP;
@@ -230,7 +231,8 @@ nf_nat_local_fn(unsigned int hooknum, ret = NF_DROP; } #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM - else if (ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.u.all != + else if (ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.protonum != IPPROTO_ICMP && + ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple.dst.u.all != ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.src.u.all) if (ip_xfrm_me_harder(skb)) ret = NF_DROP;