On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 11:05 PM Matthew Wilcox [off-list ref] wrote:

What happened to my suggestion from last time of encoding symbols < 128
as 0-127 and symbols larger than that as (data[0] - 128) * 256 +
data[1]) ?

Nothing, sorry, we focused on other parts (e.g. the allocation panics)
during this iteration. I can take a look for v2.

Cheers,
Miguel