On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 05:29:13PM +0200, Til Kaiser wrote:
The port node pattern "^ethernet-port@[1-6]+$" also matches multi-digit
unit addresses such as ethernet-port@11, which the reg property does not
allow. Drop the stray '+'.
Also restrict the ethernet-ports object to its declared properties.
Without this, nodes outside the port pattern are accepted through the
generic ethernet-switch schema.
Simple test shows that it is not true, so I do not get how you
reproduced it.
Are you sending some LLM output?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Til Kaiser <redacted>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipq9574-ppe.yaml | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipq9574-ppe.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipq9574-ppe.yaml
index 6d0b21a10732..1a78e2c82b90 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipq9574-ppe.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipq9574-ppe.yaml
@@ -174,8 +174,17 @@ properties:
- interrupt-names
ethernet-ports:
+ type: object
+ additionalProperties: false
+
+ properties:
+ '#address-cells':
+ const: 1
+ '#size-cells':
+ const: 0
No need for any of these.
Best regards,
Krzysztof