Re: Some clarifications on the upstreaming process

On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:

On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 11:57:53AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 9 Sep 2026 12:44:08 +0200 Steffen Klassert wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 12:34:42PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:

quoted

On 9/9/26 12:23 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:  

quoted

Are you willing to pull this as is, or should I resend the pull
request with the incremental fix? The latter leads to problem
4.1 (patch does not apply to net).  

Due to time schedule I can't look into the series detail before tomorrow
my time. Since Jakub forwarded the AI report and left the series in PW I
assume he is looking for your replies to the AI comments - which is
pretty much would I'll do.  

It was a general question, not directly related to this pull request.

There were several issues reported, it will take a bit of time
to review the AI comments.

Thanks, I'll toss this version form PW, please let us know if it's good
(enough) and we should pull as is after all.

Most of the patches are OK, but I'll give the patch authors some time to
comment and resend the pull request then. I send just the pull request
without resending the patches to the list if that's OK. I don't want
to have yet another AI review round...

The pull request had 2 incomplete fixes but no regressions.
I'll resend the pull request without changes, we correct
the incomplete fixes with a followup.