On Fri, 2026-08-21 at 17:03 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 22:07:26 -0700 Allison Henderson wrote:
quoted
The other commentary nits from the review do have merit though. If you
like, I can send a v3 with those corrected, but I think the code itself
is ok. The patch 1 comment about cong.c is a pre-existing issue similar
to the lost-wakeup issue that patch 1 fixes. So I can send a follow-up
converting those waitqueue_active() calls to wq_has_sleeper().
I hope that helps? Thank you for being accommodating with the branch
targeting.
Thanks, yes! IIUC you don't mind sending a v3 so let's go with that
option.
You're welcome, I've sent out an updated v3 and one extra patch for cong.c.
Thanks!
Allison